One in four construction firms bankrupt

construction firms bankruptCONSTRUCTION firms are facing severe problems as the industry is collapsing under the massive pressure caused by the financial crisis according to a report in today’s Cyprus Weekly.

According to the report, the Registrar of Companies says one in four constructors are going bankrupt, while liquidators are busy at work.

Companies are seeing their property auctioned off as repossessions spike, although finding buyers has proven to be a difficult task.

Repossessed properties are not only coming from liquidated companies but also from buyers who were left stranded after property developers were unable to repay their loans. Buyers who paid part or the entire amount for a home and were expecting the Title Deeds are now effectively faced with having to pay for their property a second time.

Registrar Chris Iacovides said the problem is that companies have gone bust but their property was used as a guarantee.

An imploding construction sector is causing deep concern due to its contribution to the economy, and its collapse would have a domino effect.

Parliament lifts bank bailout burden from taxpayers

European Parliament in session
The European Parliament

THREE measures to ensure that banks shoulder the risks of failure rather than relying on taxpayers to bail them out were approved by the European Parliament on Tuesday.

Two of the measures deal with restructuring and winding down troubled banks, and the third ensures that banks, not taxpayers, guarantee deposits under €100,000 in the event of a run on a bank.

These measures complement the single bank supervision system, already in place, and take the EU far down the road towards banking union.

Parliament won substantial concessions from finance ministers, especially on the rules establishing the bank single resolution mechanism and its related €55 billion bank-financed fund, steered through Parliament by Elisa Ferreira (S&D, PT). These greatly reduce the scope for power-play politics that could otherwise block action against banks, and ensured that the fund can be established faster and used more fairly.

In the bank recovery and resolution directive, work on which was led by Gunnar Hökmark (EPP, SE), MEPs made any potential use of public money subject to very strict processes.

The updated deposit guarantee rules steered through Parliament by Peter Simon (S&D, DE), will ensure that depositors get their money back much faster if a bank fails. It also requires banks to fill guarantee schemes with real cash, rather than mere commitments.

Banks must take losses and pay for fire-fighting funds

During the economic crisis, many banks’ losses were transferred onto the taxpayer, leaving the value of the banks themselves virtually intact. “Bail-in”, enshrined in the two laws on bank crisis resolution, by contrast means that bank owners (shareholders) and creditors (primarily bondholders) will be first in line to absorb losses the bank could incur, before outside sources of finance may be called upon.

The two laws on bank resolution will also require banks to finance reserve funds to cover further losses after bail-in has been used. Countries in the banking union (all the Eurozone and possibly opt-ins) will share a bank-financed €55 billion single resolution fund, to be established gradually over 8 years. Those outside banking union will be required to set up their own bank-financed fund amounting to 1% of covered deposits within 10 years.

Less political meddling to keep ailing bank costs down

MEPs have long argued that when a bank runs into trouble, decisions on how to proceed need to be taken on sound technical grounds. Some member states on the other hand wished to give finance ministries a key role in deciding how to handle specific cases falling under the single resolution mechanism. The final compromise limits their influence and political pressure significantly to allow more fairness, speedier action and lower costs to resolve bank problems.

Depositors better protected

The update to the deposit guarantee scheme will oblige EU countries to set up their own bank-financed schemes to reimburse guaranteed deposits (up to €100,000) when a struggling bank is not able to do so itself. This will ensure that taxpayers would not have to bear the costs of guaranteeing such deposits.

MEPs also ensured that depositors will get their money faster. The total amount of their guaranteed deposit would be available within 7 working days, and a subsistence amount (decided country by country) within 5 days. MEPs also inserted clauses which include “temporary large balances” in the guarantee. If a deposit account temporarily has more than €100,000 in it, e.g. due to the sale of a house, all or a part of this higher amount is protected for at least 3 months.

Vote results

Ferreira – single resolution mechanism approved by 570 votes to 88, with 13 abstentions

Hökmark – bank recovery and resolution approved by 584 votes to 80, with 10 abstentions

Simon – update to the deposit guarantee directive approved without a vote (this was a second reading approval of the Council position, which reflected the agreement in trialogue)

Further reading and background notes

Press release – Economic and monetary affairs / Economic and monetary union

Escape to Paphos

EPISODE 5 in the BBC 2 series ‘Escape to the Continent’ was broadcast last Saturday and featured a couple from Yorkshire considering a permanent move to Paphos.

Anita Rani, who presented the programme, explained how the island’s financial crisis had resulted in house prices falling “by a massive 40 to 50 percent, which is great news if you’re a buyer – and you can pick up a property for between 10 and 15 percent below the asking price. Of course costs do vary depending on the area you choose to live in – and Paphos is considered quite desirable and therefore, a little bit more expensive. The average three bedroom house here, in a rural setting, by a village, will cost you about £200,000.”

The couple, Brian from Bradford, a former healthcare lecturer, and Evey, a guide-dog puppy trainer and a former nurse from Wakefield, had been together for six months after meeting on an Internet dating site.

Brian had visited Cyprus once before earlier in the year, stayed in Paphos, and had got to know the area very well; it was Evey’s first visit.

They preferred older properties with character, but were quite open-minded and flexible. They were looking for something detached with a minimum of two bedrooms and bathrooms, in a secluded location, with plenty of outdoor living space and a swimming pool. They’d set their budget at £200,000, but could stretch to £220,000.

During their visit they stayed in a rented house and visited the PAWS Dog Shelter at Acheleia, where they talked to Kirsty and John who had lived in Paphos for a number of years. Evey tried her hand at traditional dancing while Brian accompanied her on guitar.

Anita visited Halloumi cheese producer Philippos Philippou at Galataria, where she helped out at the factory and tried the finished product straight from the factory.

During the programme Anita mentioned a few points to bear in mind when purchasing a property in Cyprus. “Independent legal advice is strongly recommended for any financial transactions undertaken. A lawyer should ensure that a property’s Title Deeds are readily available as proof of ownership can be an issue on the island. A search should also be carried out for any pre-existing mortgages on the property or land. Money will need to be put aside for various costs including legal, transfer and agent’s fees.”

Brian and Evey looked at properties in Stroumpi, Prodromi, Tala and a mystery house Kallepia (actually it was two houses in one).

Although they liked all of the houses they saw, none of them quite suited their needs. They returned to the UK to put Brian’s house on the market so they could increase their budget for a permanent home in Paphos and planned to return to Cyprus to continue their search.

The BBC programme below runs for 59 minutes.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cocdhwCKN9A&w=470&rel=0;&showinfo=0]

You would be mad to buy a holiday home in Cyprus

YOU MIGHT expect that with building permits tanking, construction reeling and prices plunging we were looking at all those factors which should shortly create conditions for a strong market upswing, but that is not going to happen in the holiday homes market in Cyprus any time soon, even with the huge ‘overhang’ of unsold units from the last ‘boom’.

In 1990, if you had wanted to buy something on the Larnaca/Dhekelia road, the price, converted into euros, would have ranged from €17,500 for an apartment to €50,000 for a small house.

Ten years later, a small house in Protaras would have cost you around €120,000 and that same house five years later in 2005, around €220,000.

At this point, the holiday homes market was dead in the water with the average price of a holiday home in Cyprus exceeding the price of a house in Wallsend, near Newcastle.

The boom was on its way out, but many new developers did not realise that until later on and continued to build, borrow, and take deposits as if all was well.

Up until then, the ‘early settlers’ didn’t understand price except by reference to back home, namely “much cheaper than the UK”. They certainly didn’t understand registered.

The thought that Cyprus operated under an English system obscured all.

Beating prices in Wallsend, the advent of social media, the advent of opportunistic developers, the huge publicity given to such as the O’Dwyer case, and the someone knowing someone who didn’t have title deeds or even the remotest chance of them began to take a heavy toll long before the financial crisis and later, the kourema or haircut.

According to the theory we should now have started seeing buyers come back into the market.

Prices have fallen up to 50 per cent. Wallsend is more expensive again. Yet in the first two months of 2013, there were three, yes, three transactions in the Famagusta district, involving foreigners, who, don’t forget, made up 80 per cent of buyers in the holiday homes market in Cyprus.

We are forced to conclude, either that potential buyers believe that prices have still further to fall, and I agree, or that these markets are not at present price sensitive, with which I also agree. So what’s in the way?

You would have to be certifiably insane or just plain awash with money to even begin to think about buying a holiday home in Cyprus at the moment. This government and the last have really done nothing at all to resolve the title deeds disaster.

Christofias’ ‘amnesty’ was a help for solvent, reputable developers, but for the insolvent and those developers who never intended to provide deeds, it did absolutely nothing to advance the case. More seriously, it showed the impotence, or unwillingness, of the government to deal with this at all, and that is the message to the world.

Much of what is available for sale, not only doesn’t have title, but if it does, it is old and needs refitting. Or frankly, it is crap: poorly located or positioned, densely developed and with neglected, overgrown, run down common areas.

Almost nobody wants to buy a holiday home in, say, Frenaros or Dherynia. It would be tough to shift much of this available stock or planned projects at any price.

Meanwhile, taxation has increased: now we have VAT and property tax that actually has to be paid and we know that it is going up progressively.

The scams of super inflated service charges and signing fees are now all well-known too. The solvency of developers is another issue, and, if not, then confiscation or repossession by the banks will be.

There has also been a fall in Russian buyers due to EU sanctions.

And let’s not forget the unavailability of credit and the fear of Cyprus’ banks, not just due to capital inadequacy and non-performing loans (NPLs), but previous scams like the promotion of Swiss franc denominated mortgages.

The poor regulation and doubts about performance standards of lawyers and estate agents and other service providers also comes into play, and the anti-foreigner sentiment.

Now, whether any of this is right or wrong is in a way irrelevant. It is however what potential overseas buyers perceive.

Make no mistake, unless something seismic happens this is where we are headed. Instant sticking plasters like primary residence protection are all well and good, but no substitute for a comprehensive overhaul to make the system work instead of trying to fix a broken outdated system.

If I were a bank I’d be spending a lot of time in the toilet

If I were a bank, I think that I should be spending quite a lot of time in the toilet. You cannot deal with 47.47 per cent NPLs without a market. We don’t have a sufficient market.

That is not to do with price and even if it were, prices falling further wouldn’t help the banks. It is to do with structure, and in my opinion, only the government, in consultation with serious industry players can fix that and at present there is no sign of the realisation of the extent of the problem.

The government cannot keep its head in the sand. The sooner we have a modern land law and tenure system, the financially safer we shall be.

For those of you who are still awake, you will by now have realised that although there was a market downturn, buyers long ago got sick of the system, the lack of quality, and greedy prices.

In other words the system is broken. There is a danger that exactly the same is now going to happen to tourism, the nation’s only remaining industry.

It’s of such poor quality and very expensive, and there is no respect for the customer or understanding of their needs. Without tourism, the kindling for the holiday home markets also goes away as well. Kalinikta. It’s margarita time.

About the author

Philip Beardwood, Bsc Est Man FRICS, is a real estate professional.

NPLs in the land of freebees and populism

Debts (NPLs)MORE than 12 months have passed since the haircut and very little has been accomplished to stem the slump in prices and the rise in NPLs. Regaining trust in our banking system cannot be accomplished with conflicting statements, leaks, and populism.

In fact, you don’t understand what is going on until you consider the place and the context. This is the land of populism, favours and freebees, where “getting away with murder” is an accomplishment to be proud of; where almost no one is ever punished.

Jobs and houses we don’t deserve

The corruptive ways in which good jobs, promotions and positions of power are being secured have metastasized from the job market to the property market. If you can get a cushy job, a high position and a fat salary without deserving it why not an almost free house, preferably a big one with a sea view without having to pay for it?

You simply make a large loan from a bank (regardless of your income) putting as collateral the house you buy or build with the loan. You service your 20-year loan for a year or two and then you stop, claiming financial hardship. The bank cannot take your house away and throw you and your two Mercedes Benz out in the street. It is your human right to keep your house even if you didn’t pay for it; it has already been paid by some bank depositor who was gullible enough to trust his money with a banker who was greedy enough (for a bonus) to lend it to a borrower who had no intention to pay it back.

An imaginative system of social justice

This is actually an imaginative system of social justice, income redistribution and financial intermediation. The compassionate and financially disciplined bureaucrats of the Eurogroup should adopt it and institutionalise it throughout the Eurozone along with their successful Cyprus experiment of a deposits haircut which, by the way, they did not invent. Here, bank depositors and shareholders have been receiving regular haircuts for years by delinquent borrowers living in mansions. This is social justice the Cyprus way, and our bankers, until recently, were content to play the game since they received their cut until private debt reached the astronomical level of 300 per cent of GDP. If you continued to live in a small house, it was because you were not very smart. Not servicing one loan or two does not prevent you from getting another loan or a credit card to finance your overconsumption to go with the large house you secure with your non-performing housing loan.

NPLs induced by rumour and populism

But still, there were many good people who choose to service their loans until the economic crisis hit. The rising unemployment, the haircut of salaries and deposits, and the closing of failing businesses have robbed many people of their ability to service their loans. There is no question that people who stop servicing their housing loans because of genuine hardship deserve some assistance. The problem is that an even greater number of people, who are able to service their loans, exploit the situation. They expect to be helped too by a rumored loan haircut, or impending legislation to protect the first residence. They hoped that populism, another favorite Cypriot sport, practiced daily by politicians, will ensure that any legislation to protect poor people from eviction will be broad enough to include them too.

Moral hazard, pyramids and conflicts of interests

Another innovative financial instrument with which we accumulate loans we do not intend to repay is the short-term loan for land developers. Even though both the bank and the borrower know very well that a five-year loan for land development cannot be repaid in five years they proceed with it anyway. The viability and profitability of the development based on a sound business plan receive hardly any scrutiny. Soon enough the loan is extended and expanded for another five years, no questions asked. If the developer does not have the cash flow to service his loans he is given further loans to service them creating a sort of a pyramid founded on unsound financial and business assumptions and spurious thinking.

The situation becomes even more muddled when the banker and the developer are the same person; In the past, the Chairman of the Board of a bank borrows from the bank he chairs for his land development gambles. The intermingled conflicts of interest are another favourite sport of bankers, businessmen and politicians (not all but many) in this Mediterranean paradise.

Procrastination and uncertainty

The first thing that should have been done when the new management took over the Bank of Cyprus last September, was taken measures to arrest the growth of NPLs and tumbling prices of properties used as collateral to stabilise the situation and to regain trust in the bank. Instead of immediate and drastic measures, the issue of NPLs was allowed to falter for months with rumours being spread for massive divestitures and haircut of loans resulting in falling property values and rising non-performing loans. The lingering uncertainty contributed to reduced deposits and increased outflows while the leaks and mixed messages about splitting the BOC into good and bad bank further affected the psychology of the world and the reliability of banks.

What should be done?

We must now proceed without further procrastination but avoid also kneejerk moves. We need strategic planning, imaginative solutions, clarity and immediate and concerted action by all involved. Since the Bank’s management expended its grace period on secondary matters and failed to responsibly manage the destiny of our only remaining systemic bank, the Central Bank and Ministry of Finance must take a more active role. Failure to save the Bank will have severe macroeconomic as well as social consequences.

Real vs strategic NPLs

First of all we need to distinguish between NPLs due to real economic hardship because of the crisis and NPLs for strategic reasons. To terminate strategic non-servicing of loans, which could very well be the great majority, incentives and penalties must be established. An incentive / penalty could be to offer an interest-rate reduction for timely payments.

Genuinely non-performing loans should be separated into housing loans and business / development loans. The mortgage loans should be further divided into those deserving of social assistance based on specific income and asset criteria for social policy. Venture / development should be divided into potentially viable and non-viable based on specific business and economic development policy criteria.

Mortgage loans

Specify the number of genuinely non-performing housing loans that need and deserve social assistance on such criteria as the primary residence up to a moderate size, unemployment or substantial reduction of earnings of low-pay debtors, the absence of other significant assets, and the servicing of the loan before the crisis. This limited number of debtors should receive assistance from the government (ie. the taxpayer), unless the economic situation of the debtor is expected to improve in the foreseeable future. Helping people in dire need is part of the social policy of the state.

All other mortgage loans not serviced should be restructured with or without the help of the mediator. If the borrower and the bank fail to reach agreement, the property and the loan should be transferred to a Housing Finance Corporation (endowed or guaranteed by the state but independent from it) which would service the loan while the borrower would continue to reside in the house paying rent. If the rent is not enough to cover the interest on the loan, the difference will be added to the principal of the loan to be repaid over time. The debtor would have the right to repurchase the residence after a period of time 10-15 years ) at a predetermined price.

Business and property development loans

Genuinely non-performing loans should be separated into potentially viable and non-viable. A nearly bankrupt economy cannot afford to continue to maintain and support insolvent debtors and non-viable developments. On the other hand an economy seeking to restart growth cannot ignore the existence of potentially viable land developments and enterprises which, if supported to attract investors, would be the quickest way to recovery.

Property values will rise again

Property prices are currently low and likely to fall even lower, but the long-term outlook is bullish. In three to four years property prices are likely to return to the levels before the crisis; this time, not in the form of a new bubble but due to our genuine comparative advantages, including climate and location and the limited supply of land in an attractive Mediterranean island. The exploitation of natural gas deposits and possible settlement of the Cyprus problem would result in further increase in property values. We need a well-planned strategy which will end uncertainty, highlight our real comparative advantages and encourage foreign direct investment in the real economy.

A meaningless exercise in financial futility

Bankers at dinnerWHILST reclining in the comfy chairs after a particularly satisfying luncheon at the club with a few long-term banker acquaintances, the conversation turned, as it does, amicably but nevertheless purposefully:

“So, (Spirit of) OJB, Old Boy, with regards to this Cyprus question,” Attention levels increased discernibly whilst the semblance of diffidence was proffered, “we hear about NPLs and all that…”

Ears, even in the dingiest, felt-lined corners of the members’ lounge, pricked up. Rumours of the fate awaiting the Eurozone Testing Ground Country (à la Scotland under the 1980s Conservative administrations in the UK) had long been bandied about, but now real information from an alleged “Insider” (the only information that one could reliably trust as “Official Communiqués” and audited accounts were only for the consumption of the general public) could herald a veritable gold rush in the futures market for ownership of the much-discussed future assets of the beleaguered Mediterranean island.

“Exactly how much is owed by whom to whom for what using which collateral and means of payment and who will eventually pick up the tab, if anyone?”

(Apologies for the convoluted nature of the question, but I did say they were bankers!)

(Spirit of) OJ cleared his throat (to match his “after dinner fine brandy-numbed, completely-empty-and-struggling-for-a-response” brain). This was going to be a tricky one…

“Well, you see…” he began, confidently but completely vacuously…

Then, the club bell tolled (phew!) and a most important announcement was made: “Flight MH370 now “missing” for 1 month!” (accompanied by loud cheers from hidden figures shrouded in the darkness of the lounge). Everyone instinctively knew: only another 5 months and the aviation air disaster statute of limitations would expire, meaning no compensation could be claimed by relatives of any of the victims! (Correction: alleged victims. Phew, close one…). None of the Lloyds Names secreted in the room could withstand another year of catastrophic losses like 2012…

(Spirit of) OJB breathed a sigh of relief (which was noted but ignored – for the moment – by the assorted after-dinner brandy sippers, to be used as ammunition against SoOJB, if and when required in the future).

In the taxi on his way home, SoOJB began to think about the narrow escape from being revealed as completely clueless – in front of his present and future enemies, currently politely masquerading as the opposite – of the full extent of the Great Cyprus Financial Swindle. In order to prepare his future defence, which he was sure would eventually be necessary (probably sooner rather than later) and before going to bed, he sat at his desk. No-one would be so impolite as to ask about the detail of the pronouncements they were sure to try to elicit from him, at the next possible opportunity, re: the Fate of Cyprus, but he’d have to make sure that he’d done his research anyway.

Using the wonderful figures from: The RICS Cyprus Property Price Index (Q4 2013); the latest Cyprus Economy and Real Estate Forecast conducted by Leaf Research (as of 31 Mar 2014) and the wonderfully informative and insightful, although playfully speculative and highly entertaining piece Property Developers: Run Forrest! Run! of 23 Feb 2014 by one Pavlos Louizou, he decided to put together some probable scenarios in answer to his banker mate’s question. The following are his findings:

Taking for granted the accuracy of the Cyprus Economy Forecast, we have:

Total Household Loans € 11,800,000,000.00
Total Household Loans as % of Total Loans 53.00%
=> Total Loans € 22,264,150,943.40
Total Non Performing Loans € 24,100,000,000.00
NPLs as % Total Loans 108.25%
NPLs as % GDP 147.00%
GDP € 16,394,557,823.13
Construction Non Performing Loans € 4,620,000,000.00
=> “Other” Non Performing Loans € 19,480,000,000.00

SoOJB attempted some fairly simple calculations on: Cash Ratios (does Cyprus PLC earn enough money to pay interest on what it owes?), Free Asset Ratios (the money CPLC says it has, can it actually USE any of it to pay off what it owes?) and Debt Asset Ratios (how much CPLC owes compared to how much it’s worth and has it got any chance of ever paying any of it off?) but his head began to overheat.

Due to: lack of information; seemingly bizarre figures (i.e. from the above, total Household Loans at 53% of Total Loans means that Total Loans are €22.2bn, Total NPLs are €24.1bn, thus 108.25% Of all loans given are NPLs (thus bad), surely some mistake? (hic. After dinner brandy again, apologies)) and general tiredness, the calculations just didn’t seem to add up.

Factor into any attempt at calculation the new, empathetic and exciting governmental proposals of : you can give your property to the government and rent it back from them until you die, leaving, well, nothing really, except probably a debt, for your nearest and dearest; the recoverable collateral of primary residences, if the bill goes through, will be converted into irrecoverable collateral; as well as the teeny-weeny virtually irrelevant smidgen of a point that probably almost all Cash in banks is not there on goodwill or confidence due to currency controls and is likely to break for the border at first opportunity, then no official figures seem to bear any relation to anything even remotely akin to all SoOJBs years of “normal” banking models. The Erik the Viking song “Tee tum, tee tum” flashed into SoOJB’s mind, but was quickly dismissed as he had to focus. He scratched his now very-warm head. He had to look at this another way.

“Oh-kaaaayyyy,” he said to himself. “Let’s get back to basics. All people want to really know is this:

“How much is my property worth and how much debt is there against it?” (thus is it worth keeping hold of, selling or maybe even buying more?)

“Seems a fair enough point”. SoOJB congratulated himself on at least finding something that appeared to make sense.

However, there was also the obvious question of what the “other” non-performing loans of €19.4bn were for.

Sensible assumptions (although not completely conclusive) could be that €11.8bn of this could be Household Loans, leaving €7.68bn for something else that has gone bad. I don’t know what that is. SoOJB frowned.

If we assume for now that this €7.68bn has nothing to do with un-title-deeded property (you know what I mean) (i.e. maybe secured personal loans on titled property), then we have the following scenario, that I like to call Scenario 1:

No Loans Against Deedless Property Apart from “Construction” Loans
(Assuming “Construction” NPLs related to Deedless Property)
Number of Properties Without Title Deeds (approx) 120,000
“Construction” NPLs per Property € 38,500.00
Property Prices
Apartments € 107,536.00
Houses € 343,823.00
Average Property Price € 225,679.50
Net Average Property Value € 187,179.50
Debt Asset Ratio 17.06%

Which isn’t that bad really. However, not really likely, as we know already that loans taken out by the purchaser to buy homes (i.e. Swiss Franc Mortgages) probably form part of the Total Home Loans figure (how much of it? Anyone’s guess!)

So, we have a Scenario 2:

ALL NPLs Are Against Deedless Property (but no other debts…)
(Assuming ALL NPLs related to Deedless Property)
Number Properties Without Title Deeds (approx) 120,000
If ALL NPLs relate to deedless property, then how much per Property € 200,833.33
Average Property Price € 225,679.50
Net Average Property Value € 24,846.17
Debt Asset Ratio 112.37%

Ouch. This would mean that the average property would be actually worth about the cost of a Twix (which are really expensive in some countries!)

However, neither of the above scenarios are true, as we know that each NPL is likely to have a whole load of other debts  attached to it (VAT, IPT, CGT, various Memos for work not paid for and, last but not least, normal and penal interest!) This will push up the amount of encumbrance on the property. We won’t even factor in owner occupier mortgages (as no way of knowing).

A FAR more realistic way of working out what the Net Value of the average property in Cyprus is would be from Mr Louizou’s example of a few weeks ago (I like this one!):

(Attachment of the full detail for the Good and Bad Andreas spreadsheets)

To summarise, if the developer Andreas were an extremely good boy and paid the interest due when he could, plus all of the capital he could (as soon as he could, leaving himself completely broke for the whole period he had his development), we have Scenario 3 (summary below):

“Good” Andreas’ Example of Likely Debts Against Property
Debts per Property € 91,663.84
Property Price € 120,000.00
Net Average Property Value € 28,336.16
Debt Asset Ratio 76.39%

Now, it is extremely unlikely that Andy-mou would leave himself and his family completely brassic for 10 years and still be sporting a debt of nearly €1,000,000 to the bank (€916,638 debts spread over 10 properties, from the original example), so far more likely would be Scenario 4, summary below, where he pays the first year’s interest to avoid penal interest rate charges but then, when he can’t sell his high quality wares (ahem…), he doesn’t pay a red cent more to his mates at the bank.

So, we have the following – scenario 4:

“V. Bad” Andreas’ Example of Likely Debts Against Property
Debts per Property € 320,641.00
Property Price € 120,000.00
Net Average Property Value -€ 200,641.00
Debt Asset Ratio 267.20%

Maybe Scenario 4 is a bit of an exaggeration (as he may pay some capital), but judging from the abject poverty we see every day in the lifestyles of the developers (ahem again, but much bigger this time), Scenario 4 seems a lot closer to the truth than Scenario 3. And we still have to add on any purchaser mortgages, good or bad.

So, in answer to the original Banker mate’s question:

Q: “Exactly how much is owed by whom to whom for what against which collateral and with which means of payment and who will eventually pick up the tab, if anyone?”

A: “A poo of a lot by mostly developers (but some miffed mortgagors who either refuse to pay anymore or simply can’t afford it) but exact figures unclear to the banks for property the mortgagor paid for but doesn’t own against collateral they don’t own with probably not much means of payment (as they spent a lot of their money on buying the thing they don’t own in the first place!), with the tab possibly partly picked up by the EU (so the whole sorry mess can continue ad infinitum, cos if the EU don’t, their own particular gravy-train party grinds to a halt, which it probably will anyway), if anyone”.

Anticipating the final question (“Can we make any money out of it?”), SoOJB scribed, with sleep clawing at his now thoroughly weary brain, “When the eventual default happens (as the EU’s financial backers, the Germans, won’t do “ad infinitum”. Well, not forever ever), any buildings not crumbling into the hard-baked Mediterranean earth will probably be resold to the very same developers at a pittance, once the occupants have given up the ghost. So yes…”.

At which point, smiling, he added the sneaky caveat, “if you’re willing to wait a while and are a Cyprus property developer of the right sort (and not a Shepherd!)”

Final comment sufficiently cryptic to preserve membership to the club until next set of questions (hopefully not before the next few years’ fine dinners…), SoOJB willingly succumbed to the arms of Morpheus, a good day’s work well done.