Strategic defaulters and sovereign corruption

ON 2 SEPTEMBER 2019, the so-called Estia Scheme came into operation in Cyprus, whereby individuals who have deliberately defaulted on their housing loans may apply for a government-backed scheme that reduces their loan liabilities substantially. The Cyprus Mail editorial opinion article of 3 September provides the essential details of the scheme.

As has been widely discussed in the media, normal housing loan and mortgage contracts in the EU require the lender to institute non-performing loan (NPL) procedures after 90 consecutive days of non-repayment. NPL options include extending the loan period so as to reduce the amount of the regular repayments, agreeing a fixed temporary period of lower repayments after which the borrower must repay at a higher rate, and facilitating the sale of the property so that the borrower may buy a less costly one and thereby clear their NPL debt. By such means, ordinary non-wealthy borrowers who get into financial difficulty, often through no fault of their own e.g. loss of income from unemployment or ill health, may be spared foreclosure and loss of their primary residence while still honouring their debts to the lender.

However, while in Cyprus such normal NPL arrangements typify the housing market, there has arisen in recent years an altogether different class of defaulting borrower, known as the ‘strategic defaulter’. Such defaulters are largely wealthy individuals having significant assets, often including multiple immovable properties. According to the Cyprus Mail article, they number some 10,000 to 15,000.

Such a fancy term as ‘strategic defaulter’ unfortunately masks the reality of their stance and conduct, and suggests that somehow they are rather clever people who, unlike the rest of us and the ordinary non-wealthy borrower, are ‘big-shot thinkers’. In reality, there is nothing honourable, praiseworthy or super-intelligent about them. Whereas ordinary defaulters end up defaulting through getting into financial difficulty, strategic defaulters are not in financial difficulty and default deliberately as a deception for financial gain. They perhaps gamble correctly that (a) lenders will not have the determination to pursue them for recovery if they hold out, and (b) politicians, especially any who are personal friends or who are looking for favours, will want to keep them happy.  Strategic default, nonetheless, is a fraud to the detriment of the banks’ other customers, its shareholders and investors and a fraud against the taxpayer who ultimately underwrites the Estia scheme.

Such flagrant fraud ought to warrant a criminal investigation. Moreover, widespread collusion between, on the one hand, the banks and ‘strategic defaulters’ and, on the other hand, government administrations and legislators over a significant period of time is not only to the detriment of the banks’ other customers and investors and the taxpayer but also against the wider public interest. By not only failing to correct the system and cease the collusion but, on the contrary, sanctify and encourage it by legislation, the collusion has become an accepted and institutionalized fact.

Such government orchestrated collusion on such a scale is way beyond grand corruption and is called ‘sovereign corruption’. The Council of Europe’s GRECO (Groupe d’Etats Contre la Corruption) should take note for its next report on Cyprus.

However, if strategic defaulters and the Estia scheme were not bad enough in themselves, regrettably we also have the whole sorry saga of the Cyprus property fraud-and-title-deeds scandal that erupted around 2004 and has raged ever since. This website has been replete with articles on it and tales of personal woe from victims for all that time. The collapse of Laiki Bank, the near collapse of Bank of Cyprus and near collapse of the government in 2013 arose in large part from the causes of that scandal.

As a condition of the 2013 EU bailout, the Troika (ECB, IMF, EU) required the government to sort out the Title Deeds mess pronto and the banks to institute robust and effective systems for loan approvals, loan performance, and NPL recovery. That has not happened and the Estia scheme is the latest piece of evidence as far as NPLs are concerned. The Title Deeds debacle also remains, six years later. It is all part of the endemic sovereign corruption that afflicts Cyprus.

About the author

Dr Alan Waring is a risk consultant who was a prominent member of the Cyprus Property Action Group from 2005 to 2015 and contributed the Risk Watch Column in Financial Mirror 2004 to 2017.

His latest book is a two-volume anthology The New Authoritarianism: A Risk Analysis of the Alt-Right Phenomenon from Ibidem Verlag.

©2019 Alan Waring

Estia mortgage relief scheme launched

THE MORTGAGE-RELIEF scheme Estia for struggling home owners was officially launched on Monday with the opening of applications for the scheme which will be accepted until November 15.

Completed applications can only be submitted to the bank or credit acquiring company with which the applicant has credit facilities.

The banks and companies participating in the scheme are the Bank of Cyprus, the Hellenic Bank, the Cyprus Asset Management Company (Kedipes), Alpha Bank, Astrobank, Eurobank, the National Bank of Greece and Gordian Holdings.

The stated purpose of Estia is to assist, support and protect vulnerable households who have mortgaged their primary residences for their loans and at the same time reduce the high number of bad debts.

It applies to loans (mortgages) that were deemed non-performing on September 30, 2017. Loans designated as non-performing after that date are not eligible. The primary residence which is mortgaged must have a maximum market value of up to €350,000.

The Estia scheme applies to the first mortgage on a residence, and covers loans or credit facilities regardless of currency.

Total household income of the applicant must not exceed the following:

  • €60,000 for a family with at least four dependents;
  • €55,000 for a family with three dependents;
  • €50,000 for a family with two dependents;
  • €45,000 with one dependent;
  • €35,000 for a couple with no children;
  • €20,000 for a single-member household.

The Estia criteria will also apply to single-parent families.

An applicant’s other net assets in 2016, 2017, and 2018, must not exceed 80 per cent of the market value of the main residence after its evaluation.

In any case they should not exceed €250,000.

Any cash or deposits exceeding €10,000, or 20 per cent of the rest of the applicant’s net assets, whichever is higher, and which are not used to secure any other loans, must be paid towards the non-performing facility before the restructuring procedure.

Other terms and conditions also apply.

The loans will be written down to the market value of the primary residence and then the borrower will have to pay two-thirds of the rescheduled loan every month and the taxpayer (the state) is going to subsidise one-third of the monthly instalments on that rescheduled loan.

Borrowers who have not yet done so should ask the bank for the details of their loan in order to fill out the application correctly. Those who feel they do not have the time to appoint their own evaluator will also need the bank’s assessment as to the market value of the home.

The bank will then check whether the borrower has the ability to repay the loan, that is the loan is viable, as well as other eligibility criteria, such as the borrower’s income and assets, and will conduct a preliminary assessment of the application, which will then be sent to the labour ministry.

If the bank considers the loan to be unsustainable, the application will be rejected by the ministry, and if the bank considers the loan to be eligible, the ministry will verify the eligibility criteria.

The banks have until November 29 to complete their end of the process and the ministry until March 2020.

Details of aid for Pissouri landslide victims

Peter Field and Kayt Field’s home that has been torn apart by a landslide

THE INTERIOR Ministry will grant monetary assistance to Pissouri residents who were forced to leave their homes after they became uninhabitable due to the landslide so that they can afford temporary housing, it was announced on Thursday.

The announcement followed a cabinet decision on Wednesday to residents of the Pissouri area known as Limnes where many homes have virtually collapsed.

The assistance that will be granted following an application to the district administration is for temporary housing and will be assessed in the same way as the guaranteed minimum income, the ministry said.

The government had pledged ad hoc financial assistance to residents in June, but stressed that this was not compensation.

Thursday’s announcement stressed that the decision to grant assistance was not in any way connected or had any bearing on the decision that will be made on the basis of a study that is expected mid-2020.

“Also, it should not be perceived in any way as assumption of responsibility on behalf of the state over the problem created due to the instability of the earth,” the ministry said.

Along with the assistance, the cabinet decided to undertake work to shore up the area ahead of the study into the causes of the landslides.

One of the immediate measures would be to construct a retaining wall along Kimonos Street in a bid to stabilise the area while the water development department will redesign the main sewerage system to cover the entire community. Work on the system will start as soon as the area was stabilised.

Subsidies will also be granted to seal existing absorption pits and replace them with watertight tanks. The scheme applies to owners of homes in the area that faces the landslide front.

The measure concerns the south side, the houses in the central part up to the Apostolos Andreas Street, and the individual residences next to the Panayia Akonopetra chapel on the north side.

Affected owners will also be asked to review the initial structural studies of their houses with a view of putting measures in place to secure their homes, the ministry said.

Many of the affected homes in the area have virtually collapsed, the result of a continuous and accelerating landslide. Homes and gardens have been ripped apart, walls and pools are collapsing and roads have split and buckled becoming impassable.

Residents insist that the catastrophic damage to their properties is due to a landslide triggered by uncontrolled groundwater belonging to the state and as such they are victims of a natural disaster and are entitled to state compensation by law.

Cabinet agrees to help Pissouri landslide victims

THE CABINET on Wednesday decided to afford humanitarian assistance to residents of an area of Pissouri whose homes have become uninhabitable due to landslides.

The government had pledged ad hoc financial assistance to residents in June, but stressed that this was not compensation.  No specific amount has been announced.

Interior minister Constandinos Petrides had said that, at present, compensating homeowners was ruled out.

The cabinet also decided to carry out work to shore up the area, known locally as Limnes, without having to wait for a study on how to comprehensively deal with the problem, which is expected next year.

Sewerage system

The government will also expedite construction of a sewerage system.

Many of the affected homes in the area have virtually collapsed as a result of a continuous and accelerating landslide and many homes are now deemed unfit for habitation.

Homes and gardens have been ripped apart, walls and pools are collapsing and roads have split and buckled becoming impassable.

Desperate homeowners have long pleaded with the government for help, but to no avail.

In 2015, the then minister, Socratis Hasikos, said it was the government’s duty to intervene, but since his resignation in May 2017, no action has been taken.

In April, auditor-general Odysseas Michaelides said the government should not assume responsibly and compensate as it would set a precedent.

Residents insist that the catastrophic damage to their properties is due to a landslide triggered by uncontrolled groundwater belonging to the state and as such they are victims of a natural disaster and are entitled to state compensation, by law.

Editor’s comments

I wonder if the government’s decision to construct a sewerage system has anything to do with the fact that the European Commission referred Cyprus to the European Court Justice over its failure to ensure that all agglomerations with a population of more than 2,000 inhabitants have adequate collection and treatment systems for urban waste water as required under EU rules (Council Directive 91/271/EEC)?

 

EC asks Cyprus to comply fully with EU law

THE EUROPEAN Commission on 25 July 2019 decided to send an additional letter of formal notice to Cyprus because their national rules do not comply with EU law on unfair commercial practices (Directive 2005/29/EC) and unfair contract terms (Unfair Contract Terms Directive, Council Directive 93/13/EEC).

The Commission opened this infringement case in 2013 based on a series of complaints from EU citizens who bought real estate in Cyprus. Real estate developers, banks and lawyers had allegedly omitted to inform buyers about pre-existing mortgages when selling immovable properties.

The Commission found that the Cypriot authorities were not effectively enforcing neither the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive nor the Unfair Contract Terms Directive. The Commission has been in contact with the Cypriot authorities, which responded positively to several of the concerns raised by the Commission on the transposition and implementation of the two directives. However, the matter has not been resolved so far.

Cyprus now has two months to reply to the arguments raised by the Commission. Otherwise, the Commission may decide to send a reasoned opinion to the Cypriot authorities.

Further reading

July infringements package: key decisions

Foreign demand for Cyprus property slumps

3

Foreign demand for Cyprus property slumpsDEMAND for properties in Cyprus by third country nationals has slumped, but it is not clear whether this resulted from the introduction of stricter controls of applicants for investment in exchange for passports, local media reported Thursday.

Yiannis Misirlis, deputy chairman of the Cyprus Land and Building Developers Association (LBDA), told financial news outlet Stockwatch that he expected a clear indication as to the reasons for the slump by the end of the year.

(correction) He said that nowadays, we need an annual demand for 600-700 units at the so-called ‘super-prime’ market (high rises, above €1 million etc). And since all these high rise projects take at least 5 years from conception to delivery, the market should be able to absorb most of the units that are on the market today (if not all of them).

This kind of supply does not exist today. So there is quite a good demand for luxury apartments.

Following criticism by the European Union and bad international publicity, the Cypriot government announced the introduction of stricter criteria as of this month.

New rules

Applicants for investment must be vetted by one of three international firms chosen by Cyprus which will check the source of the income of applicants.

In addition to an investment of 2 million euros (2.23 million U.S. dollars), applicants must also make two additional contributions of 75,000 euros each to the Institute of Research and Innovation and to the state controlled Land Development Organization.

President of Land Development Organization, Marios Pelekanos, said that it collected contributions from just three applicants under the new rules. The money will be spent to provide accessible housing to low income people.

Pelekanos said that he expected at least 300 applications to be submitted within a year, by July, 2020.

The President of the Cyprus Association of Property Owners (KSIA), Giorgos Mouskides, said he was concerned that foreign investors will turn to other countries with a less demanding program for passports.

“There has been an increased interest in the investment for passport program up to May, in anticipation of the stricter rules and the additional contributions required. But the introduction of the rules and the demand for additional contributions amounting to 150,000 euros resulted in a reduced interest for investment,” Mouskides said.

“Certainly there were very few more applications in June and July and this will be made evident when accumulated data will be announced at the end of the year,” he added.

In about six years since the investment for passport program started, an estimated 1,350 applications have been processed, which correspond to just 0.3 percent of passports issued to third country investors by all EU countries.

However, the 4 billion euros invested in the properties section was enough to help the small economy of Cyprus recover from its 2013 meltdown, thanks to the revival of the construction sector.

Copyright © 2000-2019 XINHUANET.com