Law regulating self-catering rentals enacted

ON FRIDAY January 17, the House of Representatives passed a new law, The Regulation of the Establishment and Operation of Hotels and Tourist Accommodations (Amendment) Law of 2020 N. 9(I)/2020 (also “the Law”), regulating the registration and operation of self-catering accommodation, which was subsequently published in the government’s Official Gazette on February 7, 2020.

The Law is directed at operators currently utilising online platforms such as Airbnb and Booking.com and it was passed by an overwhelming majority of 52 MPs in favour and two MPs against.  Under its provisions, owners of self-catering accommodation will now have to follow a set of regulations and formalities in order to legally provide their services.

Arguably, the purpose of the newly enacted law was to regulate what has been, up to now, a profoundly uncontrolled area of business in Cyprus. Its provisions allow for the establishment of a platform which will assist authorities in imposing appropriate controls and taxation on self-catering accommodation. This platform will come in the form of a ‘Register of Self-Catering Accommodations’ which will be kept by the Deputy Ministry of Tourism.

N.9(I)/2020 is an amending law to the current Law on the Regulation of Establishment and Operation of Hotels and Tourist Accommodations of 2019 (N. 34(I)/2019). As per N. 9(I)/2020, the two laws will, from now on, be read and referred to concurrently as the ‘Laws on the Regulation of Establishment and Operation of Hotels and Tourist Accommodations of 2019 and 2020’.

What is self-catering accommodation?

A key to comprehending the essence of the Law lies with the meaning of the term ‘self-catering accommodation’.  This has been defined by the Law as: “either a single tourist furnished mansion, or a single residence, or a single apartment, which constitutes “a unit” under the provisions of the Immovable Property (Tenure, Registration and Valuation) Act, which does not constitute a “hotel” or “tourist accommodation” as defined in Part II and Part III of the same law, which is rented as a mansion or a residence or a unit and not as a part of it, and is registered in the Register of Self-Catering Accommodation under the provisions of Part IIIA.”

Self-catering rental conditions

What is important, however, is that at its core, N. 9(I)/2020 brings about a number of changes which owners or administrators of self-catering accommodation need to follow to ensure their services are provided legally.   More specifically, the renting of self-catering accommodation is from now on prohibited, unless certain conditions are met.

These conditions are exhaustively listed in Part IIIA of the Law which maintains that:

  • The self-catering accommodation bears the features and specifications of a single residence and/or a single tourist furnished mansion and/or single apartment, as these are defined by the Law.
  • The self-catering accommodation is registered in the Register of Self-Catering Accommodations.
  • The self-catering accommodation maintains at the time of operation a valid and renewed registration license.

Furthermore, the Law requires that the owners and/or rightful users of self-catering accommodation will have to complete and submit an application for the registration of their self-catering accommodation to the Deputy Ministry of Tourism.

It should be noted that the application carries a fee which will vary according to the type of the self-catering accommodation. The Law has not disclosed the differing fee levels that will be applied.

A submitted application must contain all the relevant details and characteristics of the unit, such as its technical specifications, and, evidence that it has been built as per the building permit and planning permission issued by the appropriate authorities.  The submitted application must also be accompanied by documentation proving that the self-catering unit has been registered with the Tax Department and has received either a Tax ID or a VAT no., depending on which is applicable.

Taxation and insurance

Although N. 9(I)/2020 does not make specific references to taxation matters, once registered with the Tax Department, the provisions of the Income Tax Law should apply, in that the unit owner will have to declare any income derived from the unit and pay any tax liability arising from the income.  Where, the owner of the unit is not a Cyprus tax resident, income tax will be payable in Cyprus, as it will be considered as tax arising from income from immovable property and/or business.  Proof must also be provided that the unit is insured against any danger including fire and public liability.

The Deputy Ministry of Tourism shall examine each application within 2 (two) months from the date of submission of the application and upon a successful application, each self-catering accommodation will be provided with a registration number and a licence.

It is important to emphasise that the registration number of each unit will need to be publicised on every advert and/or any form of marketing of the self-catering accommodation (i.e. platforms such as Airbnb and/or Booking.com), as well as in all relevant transactions.  As per the amended article 22 of the Law, whoever advertises or operates a self-catering accommodation without the appropriate number and licence registration in place, may be guilty of an offence which could carry a prison sentence of up to one (1) year and/or a fine not exceeding five thousand euros (€5,000).

Licensing

The registration licence will not be issued for an indefinite period of time. It shall be valid for 3 (three) years only and upon its expiry the owner will need to apply for its renewal.  Furthermore, in certain circumstances, it may be revoked subject to the Deputy Ministry of Tourism’s discretion.  These circumstances include, amongst others, where the licence has been approved based on false or misleading facts, there has been a cessation of operation of the business operating the self-catering accommodation, or where the owner/operator has been convicted of a serious offence (such as: murder, burglary, theft, fraud, forgery etc. thus creating a significant infraction of the owner/operators’ clean criminal record).

Bolstering the authority of the Deputy Ministry of Tourism is the fact that, under the Law, it will now be entitled, of its own volition, to carry out inspections of self-catering accommodations. It will be entitled to check whether a self-catering accommodation has a valid registration licence and, where it does, to also check whether the licence terms are being honoured by the owner/operator of the accommodation.

Grace period for current owners

Finally, it should be noted that, any persons operating self-catering accommodations prior to the enactment of the Law, will have a grace-period of 2 (two) years to conform with the new Law and regulations.  New owners, however, who wish to rent out their properties will have to register their units immediately.  Failure to conform with the Law after the expiry of the grace-period, will constitute an offence and the advertising and/or providing of services of self-catering accommodations in Cyprus without a registration license is now illegal.

About the author

Christiana Georgiou is a lawyer in the Elias Neocleous & Co LLC.

New rent law contains grey areas

IT WAS pleasing to hear that, after three postponements, Cyprus MPs have finally voted in the much-awaited amendment to the rent law.

The pros of the amendment are the following:

  • First, the House has exhibited the courage to touch upon this law.
  • Second, MPS have included an amendment introducing e-notifications allowing notifications to be delivered faster to defendant tenants, which in turn facilitates and speeds up the legal process.
  • The third, and the main change, concerns expediting legal processes of evicting tenants who do not pay their rent.

Specifically, the main change brought about with the law amendment is that tenants are now responsible for proving that they have paid their rent in order to be entitled to defend their case in court.

If the Court Registrar is not convinced that the tenant has paid rents due, then the landlord’s case will be sent to court where swift procedures are to take place, without the presence of the tenant.

This means that the Court’s decision to evict the tenant will be issued sooner.

So, whereas it used to take up to two to three years for a ruling to be issued, under the new legislation, we hope that period will be greatly reduced to between four and eight months.

But the question raised here is whether the Rent Control Court is ready to apply the amendment to the legislation?

We are not currently in a position to answer this question, because unfortunately despite the change, we do not know how long the Court will take to rule over whether the tenant has paid and how long the actual court case will be.

The amendment raises more questions.

What happens if a tenant pays off his debt when the case is presented before a court, but once legal action against them has stopped, they go back to their old ways and stop paying the rent?

Will the case then go to a regular trial with the tenant having the right to defend themselves, which would mean that the landlord would be left exposed once again?

The court is also obliged to give the tenant a minimum notice of three months, but it can give the tenant up to 12 months to evacuate the premises.

So, it is up to the judge to decide how many rents the landlord will miss out.

Another question raised is what happens to bad tenants who are renting a property which is not covered by the rental law.

Will their cases be presented before the District Court? These cases will, unfortunately, continue to take years before a judge issues an eviction order.

It is thus made clear from the above that the Rent Law creates different categories of tenants, landlords and real estate within the rental market itself.

Maintaining that legislation, even if amended, merely perpetuates the distortions the law itself has created.

Concluding, we are currently 20 years into the 21st century, and the state should be the one who decides on the maximum increase a landlord can ask from their tenant.

The reason why this law has not been declared unconstitutional is that no one has the financial means, the courage and the time to appeal to the Constitutional Court.

About the author

George Mouskides is the General Manager FOX Smart Estate Agency and Chairman of the Cyprus Association of Property Owners.

Larnaca port and marina gets go ahead

CYPRUS has reached an agreement with Israeli investors for the long-awaited €1.2 billion redevelopment of the Larnaca port and marina.

Transport Minister Yiannis Karousos announced on Thursday that the government has agreed with the consortium which is to take on the project after protracted negotiations.

Tender negotiations between the two sides have been ongoing since late 2018.

According to Karousos the contract with KITION OCEAN Holding, a Cypriot-Israeli consortium with UK interests, is expected to be signed within the next 10 days.

The project regards the restructuring of the marina for 600 berths, the port and surrounding land development over an area of 220,000 sqm which is expected to see the consortium invest around €1.2 billion in the project.

Plans include the development of the marina with the latest technological infrastructure, turning Larnaca port it into one capable of serving large vessels, with the expansion of piers and docks and the construction of a modern passenger terminal.

The consortium is also planning residential and commercial development with innovative architecture, streets and parks.

The project is expected to be completed over a period of 10 to 15 years.

Speaking to reporters after a meeting with Larnaca district mayors, Karousos said that this was a historic development for the town and district of Larnaca, as well as for Cyprus in general.

“I am in the happy position to announce that negotiations for the development of the port and marina of Larnaca ended with success last night. It is an investment of €1 billion with multiple benefits for Larnaca and the country’s economy,” Karousos said.

Larnaca Mayor Andreas Vyras said the deal was a “pleasant surprise” as the town has been waiting for decades to see its marina upgraded.

“This is a new era for Larnaca. The development will boost the town’s economy and create a great number of jobs”.

Deputy government spokesperson Panayiotis Sentonas said: “It is a project of great added value for our country as it is expected to increase economic activity in both Larnaca and elsewhere. It is estimated the project will contribute some €126 million to the GDP annually”.

Strong growth in construction continues

THE CYPRUS construction sector maintained its strong growth in November 2019 with 707 building permits issued compared to 597 in November 2018; an increase of 18.4% according to official figures published by the Cyprus Statistical Service.

The total value of these permits rose by 29.6% to reach €332.4 million, while their total area rose by 46.6% to reach 222.4 thousand square metres compared to November 2018.

These permits provided for the construction of 909 new homes, an increase of 56.7% compared with 580 in November 2018.

During November 2019, building permits were authorised for:

  • Residential buildings – 492 permits
  • Community residences – 1 permit
  • Non-residential buildings – 122 permits
  • Civil engineering projects – 36 permits
  • Division of plots of land – 42 permits
  • Road construction – 14 permits

Building permits for new homes

The 492 residential building permits authorised in November 2019 provided for the construction of 909 new homes (dwellings). These comprised 359 single houses, an increase of 17.3% compared to the 306 authorised in November 2018, and 133 multiple housing units including apartments, semis, townhouses and other residential complexes; a 35.7% rise compared to the 98 authorised in November 2018.

Building Permits Issued for the Construction of New Homes
(Number of Dwellings)

Month 2018 (Dwellings) 2019 (Dwellings) Increase/Decrease %age Change
January 476 548 72 15.1%
February 431 576 145 33.6%
March 467 615 148 31.7%
April 418 742 324 77.5%
May 541 907 366 67.7%
June 506 812 306 60.5%
July 632 1,028 306 62.7%
August 453 525 72 15.9%
September 576 1,114 538 93.4%
October 617 744 127 20.6%
November 580 909 329 56.7%
Totals 5,697 8,520 2,733 49.6%

Of those 909 new homes, 351 are destined for Limassol, 314 for Nicosia, 90 for Larnaca, 116 for Paphos and 38 for Famagusta.

Annual construction figures

A total of 5,571 building permits were authorised during the period January – November 2019, compared to 5,929 in the same period of 2018.  Their total value increased by 73.8% and their total area by 44.6%. The number of building permits authorised for new homes rose by 49.6%.

The 2,234 residential building permits authorised during the period January – November 2019 provided for the construction of 3,463 new homes in Limassol, 2,674 in Nicosia, 1,054 in Larnaca, 1,004 in Paphos and 325 in Famagusta.

According to the Cyprus Statistical Service, building permits constitute a leading indicator of future activity in the construction sector.

Twice as many property sales to non-EU citizens

NON-EU citizens buying property deposited more than twice the number of contracts at Land Registry offices than EU citizens in January, but with a greater emphasis on the less expensive areas of Famagusta and Larnaca compared to January 2019.

As we reported on Tuesday the first month of the new decade saw a 3 per cent fall in property sales compared to January 2019.

Official figures published on Friday reveal that of the 742 sales contracts for the purchase of property, 417 (44%) were deposited by local (Cypriot) purchasers and the remaining 325 (56%) were deposited by foreign buyers of whom 104 (14%) were EU citizens and 221 (30%) were non-EU citizens.

Looking at sales for each of the three market segments:

Domestic property sales

Property sales to the domestic market, which accounted for 44% of all sales, rose 2% in January compared with January 2019.

While sales in Famagusta and Limassol fell by 69% and 41% respectively, they rose in the remaining three districts. Sales in Paphos rose by 83%, while sales in Larnaca and Nicosia rose by 41% and 40% respectively.

Domestic Property Sale Contracts – 2019/2020 Comparison

District Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Nicosia 2019 127 164 115 137 168 121 153 90 114 163 187 154
2020 178
Famagusta 2019 32 19 16 58 45 25 2 13 16 33 13 26
2020 10
Larnaca 2019 54 82 47 73 83 42 90 53 67 81 69 88
2020 76
Limassol 2019 166 152 192 291 329 138 177 134 176 144 210 212
2020 98
Paphos 2019 30 31 28 69 175 69 54 54 34 66 64 69
2020 55
Totals 2019 409 448 398 628 800 395 476 344 407 487 543 549
2020 417

Nicosia had the highest number of sales (178), followed by Limassol (98), Larnaca (76), Paphos (55) and finally Famagusta (10).

EU property sales

Property sales to the overseas EU market, which accounted for 14% of all sales, fell 3% compared to January 2019.

While sales in Larnaca and Limassol each rose by 75%, these increases were wiped out by falls of 36% in Nicosia, 33% in Famagusta and 29% in Paphos.

Foreign (EU) Property Sale Contracts – 2019/2020 Comparison

District Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Nicosia 2019 14 14 9 19 20 16 13 5 8 10 15 14
2020 9
Famagusta 2019 9 6 14 17 10 8 17 14 10 5 9 23
2020 6
Larnaca 2019 12 12 21 18 20 11 16 13 6 23 14 23
2020 21
Limassol 2019 16 25 20 21 28 26 27 17 25 30 26 25
2020 28
Paphos 2019 56 72 61 48 69 59 73 58 61 95 61 72
2020 40
Totals 2019 107 129 125 123 147 120 146 107 110 133 125 157
2020 104

Paphos remained as the most popular place to by property with the number of sales standing at 40. Paphos was followed by Limassol with 28 sales, Larnaca 21, Nicosia 9 and finally Famagusta with 6 sales.

Non-EU sales

Property sales to the non-EU citizens, which accounted for 30% of all sales and twice the number of sales to EU nationals fell 12% compared to January 2019.

Although sales rose by 183% in Famagusta and 4% in Larnaca, they fell in the remaining three districts. Sales in Nicosia fell 50%, in Paphos they fell 28% and in Limassol by 22%.

It’s noticeable that properties in the two districts where sales rose (Famagusta and Larnaca) are generally less expensive than the other coastal towns of Limassol and Paphos – and the capital, Nicosia.

Foreign (Non-EU) Property Sale Contracts – 2019/2020 Comparison

District Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Nicosia 2019 20 17 7 13 25 8 8 8 15 10 6 12
2020 10
Famagusta 2019 12 23 15 21 32 10 30 3 14 12 26 15
2020 34
Larnaca 2019 48 31 50 49 70 49 51 27 29 56 39 51
2020 50
Limassol 2019 69 79 75 116 189 55 82 45 39 54 60 47
2020 54
Paphos 2019 101 108 96 107 160 77 103 54 78 61 108 79
2020 73
Totals 2019 250 257 243 306 476 199 274 137 175 193 239 204
2020 221

The largest number of properties were sold in Paphos (73), followed by Limassol (54), Larnaca (50), Famagusta (34) and Nicosia (10).

Now that the UK has ceased to be a member of the European Union, it seems likely that that February sales to non-EU nationals will include UK citizens.

Analysis of property sales since 2000

Cyprus Property Sale Contracts 2000 – 2020

Year Overseas Sales Domestic Sales Percentage
Overseas Sales
Total
Sales
2000 450 12,214 3.6% 12,664
2001 1,207 12,849 8.6% 14,056
2002 2,548 14,111 15.3% 16,659
2003 3,981 15,294 20.7% 19,275
2004 5,384 11,947 31.1% 17,331
2005 6,485 10,106 39.1% 16,591
2006 8,355 8,598 49.3% 16,953
2007 11,281 9,964 53.1% 21,245
2008 6,636 8,031 45.2% 14,667
2009 1,761 6,409 21.6% 8,170
2010 2,030 6,568 23.6% 8,598
2011 1,652 5,366 23.5% 7,018
2012 1,476 4,793 23.5% 6,269
2013 1,017 2,750 27.0% 3,767
2014 1,193 3,334 26.4% 4,527
2015 1,349 3,603 27.2% 4,952
2016
1,813 5,250 25.7% 7,063
2017
2,406 6,328 27.5% 8,734
20181 4,367 4,875 47.3% 9,242
2019
4,482 5,884 43.2% 10,366
2020 (Jan)
325 417 43.8% 742
Totals
70,198 158,691 30.7% 228,889

1 The Department of Lands & Surveys has advised that overseas sales in 2018 and subsequent year should not be compared to sales in previous years due to changes in the methodology used to classify ‘Aliens’ (foreigners).

Cash-rich banks stockpiling real estate

AFTER acquiring real estate through debt to asset swaps with defaulted borrowers, banks are now turning to properties linked to non-performing loans, which they failed to foreclose through auction.

According to Central Bank data, banks bought 30% of properties they attempted to foreclose through auctions in 2019.

In 2018, Cyprus banks only bought 9% of properties they brought under the hammer. The data was sent by the Central Bank to parliament, which was then leaked to the press.

It shows that banks have bought one-tenth of all properties for which the owners were informed that their property was to be sold at auction under the foreclosure law.

Out of the 10,590 properties auctioned, 949 properties were acquired by mortgage lenders after the first auction failed.

The proportion of foreclosed properties that end up with the banks has increased significantly, as banks see their efforts to foreclose properties at auctions fail.

Banks have increased their success rate in selling off foreclosed properties, reaching 10.8% up until September 2019, but this is offset by the fact that fewer foreclosure notifications were sent out.

In the first nine months of 2019, 213 foreclosures were completed. Cyprus banks had sent out a total of 1,971 notices for properties to be foreclosed.

In 2018 the rate stood at a lower 5% with 203 properties foreclosed out of 4,038 notices sent out while in 2017 just 121 out of 2,625 properties were foreclosed (4.6%).

Furthermore, since 2015 a total of 10,590 notices have been sent out while banks have foreclosed just 557 of them, a success rate of 5.3%.

Bankers argue it’s an indication of the limited profitability of the divestiture framework, as banks appear to move into real estate purchases to close non-performing loans for which no other solution has been reached.

But on the other hand, it is also an indication that things are moving in a different direction than previous years.

As confirmed by financial sources, Cyprus banks have real estate portfolios comprising properties acquired through debt to asset swaps and auctions, worth over €2 bln.

“Properties being bought are then added to the bank’s property portfolio with dozens being sold online,” a banking source said.

Talking to the Financial Mirror, a banking source said that banks are making use of the option provided by the law, allowing them to buy the properties for which they initiated foreclosure procedures as a tool for reducing their NPLs.

“Being allowed to buy the property is one of the tools offered by the legal framework to mortgage lenders which is used as a last resort when a non-serviced mortgage loan receives no offers at auction.

These loans need to be removed from the banking system one way or another.”

Balance sheet

Buying the asset backing an NPL, allows the bank to remove the loan from its balance sheets, which means that banks will logistically rid themselves of NPLs, allowing them to make less provisions in the future.

This is not a choice favoured by banks, as they do not want to be burdened with acting as a real estate agent.

“Currently, having large property portfolios is already pushing banks’ operational costs upwards as they need to set up departments to handle the assets acquired,” said the source.

“Some are to be sold, while others will remain in the care of the bank until the properties are ready to be put back on the market.”

With banks extremely reluctant not to flood the market, real estate agents see this will result in banks having a large number of properties that they will need to maintain.

Panos Danos CEO of Danos / BNPRE Group told the Financial Mirror that banking institutions are turning to real estate consultants for help with managing their property portfolios.

“Whether they wanted to, or not, Cyprus banks have become real estate agents. They currently need an army of people to handle their portfolios, which also include old buildings which will need maintenance, and in some cases a good makeover,” said Danos.

The real estate consultant confirmed that banks are being careful not to overload the market which would send property prices down.

Danos noted that one of the difficulties banks will have while trying to sell property accumulated, is that Cyprus is a small market.

He does not expect to see interest from Real Estate Investment Trusts or funds investing in properties.

A financial analyst closely following developments told the Financial Mirror that banks will have difficulties in offloading properties worth some €2 billion, as they mainly consist of plots of land (50%) and commercial properties (30%).

“These properties are currently not in demand. The market is looking for small flats and houses at the moment.”

The analyst also argued that banks are not buying their way into the property market but are rather buying properties as part of their strategy to reduce their toxic loans.

He explained that banks prefer to buy the asset, thus writing off the NPL for which it was used as collateral, without allowing borrowers further time to resort to courts which will only bring about further delays, in some cases years.

“However, that is not the be-all of their strategy. The goal here is to send strategic defaulters a message that the banking system will no longer tolerate strategic defaulters.

It should be perceived as a clear sign that banks are now moving onto a different stage of their strategy on clamping down on NPLs.”

Regarding the auction process itself, by law, the initial attempt to sell a mortgaged property is carried out by the auctioneer only with a reserved selling price of no less than 80% of its market value.

If the auction does not result in the sale of the property, the bank can proceed with further efforts to sell the mortgage.

For three months from the completion of the first auction, the bank can still sell the property at 80% of its value.

After three months, the reserve value goes down to 50% of the market value when it goes back for auction.

Under the foreclosure legislation, if the lender fails to sell the mortgaged property within six months from the completion of the first auction, then the bank has the option to buy the property at its market value based on the last valuation made.