Home Blog Page 656

Surviving the Property Jungle: A Safety Kit for Property Hunters

The Politics of Homeownership and Title Deeds (3)

This final Part 3 of our articles on the property trap is about good practice. In the previous articles we explained the traps laid by others to catch purchasers and the problems the latter often experience as they fall into the traps. The present paper is about how not to fall in those traps in the first place.

This article should be treated as a charter of knowledge and preparation for every purchaser. It offers a protective gear and plentiful of practical ammunition to allow purchasers to survive most of the onslaught and the complexity of the task. This article, together with the previous two, should provide any intending purchasers enough information to prepare them for the task and challenge of purchasing a property; to take good stock of their intentions and actions and to proceed with caution but also with confidence in full knowledge that they are mentally well equipped to negotiate the risks and come out of the task pleased enough that their purchase is relatively safe. We do not offer a warranty or promise that following the simple rules below will give purchasers full cover. Basically, we are back to the dictum, “buyer beware”. If there is a trap laid out there, and one knows about it, the logical action is to avoid it if possible. The onus, therefore, is on purchasers to ensure that they know what they are doing. We offer useful sign posts. How they are followed is a matter for purchasers alone and who remain solely responsible throughout.

Rule 1: know your property

It is important, as we repeatedly commented elsewhere, not to be taken by the hype of dazzling advertisements, persuasive and smiling builders, estate agents or occupiers of the property, and a desire to leave the “rat race” for something more attractive and an assumed better lifestyle. We all need to be hopeful in our lives but we can achieve better results by taking certain precautions. Get to know the property and learn to ask the relevant questions. Is it structurally sound? Can I risk buying without a surveyor’s report? Has it all services (water, electricity, telephone) provided and connected to the mains? Is the price right? Has it title deeds? Is it mortgaged? Most importantly, purchasers must visit, see and inspect the property – not just once but at least three times. Just like people, first impressions matter but you get to know them better with experience. We are always surprised that some purchasers are intent in buying a property over the internet for instance by just choosing properties by visiting developers’ or estate agents’ websites. In such instances, we make and give raw, sharp and rough comments and advice about the many risks and pitfalls. Basically, we tell such purchasers in no uncertain terms to reconsider and stop dreaming. It does the trick for most but interestingly some still choose to pursue their fantasies irrespectively. Such behaviour normally ends in tears and frankly purchasers who do so against advice deserve what they get and should not thereafter blame others for their own misfortunes. So, purchasers ought to go out of their way to see, inspect and judge the property and carefully think matters over.

Of particular concern here are cases of buying off plan or under construction properties. They are of unknown quantity and quality and purchasers must be very careful. Many a people have suffered serious losses out of such purchases. For example, such properties may never be completed to plan or worse they may prove to be “ghost” properties i.e. non-existent. When this happens, the only thing left in the purchasers’ hands are the worthless promises of the absentee and richer vendor, the scrap of paper that once was called a drawing plan, and lots of shattered dreams.

Rule 2: know your vendor and estate agent

It is important that you know first hand who is selling you the property. The vendor (developer or not) may be selling it and the estate agent may be promoting it but they both have a common purpose: to make a living or a gain. So forget the niceties and check them out. Ask for the vendor’s credentials and most importantly whether s/he is indeed the legal or sole owner or joint owner. For example, s/he may have built the property on somebody else’s land which means there are co-owners and indeed the absolute owner, until separate title deeds are issued, are the land owners; or s/he may just own it jointly with a partner or an ex-partner who are unaware of the sale; or that his/her property for sale is mortgaged to a third party. Check on the estate agent if s/he is registered. If not, be doubly suspicious. Most serious, check whether the two are connected in any way. The vendor and the estate agent may actually be one-and-the-same family (husband and wife and other relatives for instance)! They may, alternatively, have a direct interest in the project i.e. the estate agent may be one of the co-owners or has invested a share in the development of the property. There may not be any illicit activity in that respect but the purchaser can at least weigh up the facts and decide whether the purchase is a viable proposition.

Rule 3: watch your wallet and do not promise or sign anything yet

When you are satisfied and ready to buy, you will need to reserve the property. However, do not give any money to anyone nor should you make any promises and importantly ought not to sign anything whatsoever prior to seeking independent advice. This is the time when a purchaser ought to recognize that a lot is at stake and seek out professional assistance from independent advisers. Purchasers who try to cut corners here by pretending that by by-passing professional advice (be it a surveyor’s report or legal support) will save them money could find themselves regretting their move for the rest of their lives. Seek assistance and let your professional appointees handle both the preliminaries (deposit/reservation fee, any initial paperwork etc) and the rest of the work required. This wise move may both save you money and by and large ensure a safe landing. If you find that the vendor and/or the estate agent pressure you into a deal (e.g. that they will sell the property elsewhere if you do not leave a deposit, or if you do not sign papers) walk away or just stick to our rule and advice. Express your interest and give them the name of your independent lawyers to deal with. If the vendor or his/her agents cannot accommodate this arrangement, then you better find another house from a different source.

If you or your legal advisers pay the vendor or his/her agents a deposit on the property, ensure that this is subject to contract and is refundable – just in case, for any reason, you may not proceed with the purchase. The way the deposit or reservation fee is paid and worded before a contract of sale is completed or in the contract of sale itself can make all the difference whether it is refundable or not. So check that your lawyers do the correct thing.

Rule 4: select your professional advisers carefully

Assign your purchase and trust to professionals who will work for you and you alone. That is to say, appoint your professional legal or other advisers in full knowledge that they are independent of the vendor and the estate agent. Do not ever feel afraid to ask them (and if in doubt get them to confirm it in writing) whether they have any pecuniary interest in the property (or the bigger housing estate within which the property is found). As in the case of estate agents, many such professionals may have, for example, investments in the development, construction and sale aspects of the project. They may be holding directorships and/or shares in the companies which own the land or, if not the same companies, those which are responsible for the construction or sale of the properties in question. The emphasis then in choosing your representatives must be on their declared independence (or where they cannot be independent request that they declare their interests), knowledge, reliability, efficiency and their strong sense of personal and social responsibility (i.e. to represent you with a conscience – something crucial but shamefully missing or in short supply in this time and age).

Rule 5: search the title and status of the property

Your legal representatives must carry out a title search. Prior to proceeding to contract and thus committing oneself, a thorough investigation about the property pays dividends. Everything about the property particularly planning and building permits, certificate of approval, services provided, common areas of use and whether there is a general agreement that binds all purchasers to a common legal obligation to manage and share administration and costs, ownership and title deed, mortgages or other encumbrances (such as memos), structural integrity, disputes and third party claims and so forth. If the property comes without a title deed, your legal advisers ought to explain to you the risks and how those risks can or cannot be covered. This advice may allow you to make an informed choice.

Rule 6: take cover under a sale of contract worthy of consideration

Accepting a contract of sale presented to you by the vendor, estate agent or anyone else who is not your independent legal adviser is a very risky concern. The contract must be cleared by your legal advisers or preferably you should rely on your independent legal advisers in writing up a contract that meets your specific requirements for that specific occasion. It must clearly state all the owners and co-owners, the precise nature of the property bought, boundaries, permits, design and drawing plans, any extras etc. included in the price, any mortgages or other encumbrances. If the property is mortgaged a mortgage release from the vendor’s bank together with the bank’s consent and promise to allow the transfer and registration of the title deed in the name of the purchaser is a must. It provides an assurance that if the vendor defaults, the property will not be under threat from the debtors and the purchaser will keep his/her property. If there are any other charges on the property like memos it is important that these are discharged and removed before signing up. If the vendor or his debtors are not willing to oblige, just walk away and do not give it a second thought. Also, ensure that the contract stipulates a reasonable time, after completion of the property or the signing of the contract, when the certificate of approval and the title deed will be issued and the latter to be transferred and registered in the name of the purchaser. An option for penalties should be included in case the vendor does not keep those promises without good reason. A good contract must also include an option for the purchaser to be able to cancel the contract of sale and resell the property at any time after taking possession. Conversely, there must be a clear obligation on the vendor (and that means all co-owners) to assist in the process. S/he is, after all, for as long as s/he remains the title deed holder, the one who has a legal right to sell. But beware. Some vendors do not agree to this due to the many complications and pressures (including matters of taxation) and where they agree they may impose a charge of up to CYP 3000 (Euros 5,125.80) though this figure has been known to reach higher. Finally, try hard not to pay the whole of the agreed purchase price until separate titles are issued in your name. If at the end of the day you are not happy with the cover that the contract may provide or the vendors are not willing to offer adequate cover for you, again do the correct thing: walk away from the deal. There are plenty of other properties to buy from safely and better vendors to deal with.

Rule 7: pay the stamp duty and deposit the contract at the Land Registry

On signing the contract of sale, within a month of that date ensure that it is properly stamped (that is to say you need to pay the relevant stamp duty at the local tax office) otherwise there is a penalty for the delay and within two months of the same date deposit it at the Land Registry for specific performance purposes. This will act, until separate title deeds are issued, as a charge on the property and will protect your legal rights in case of breach of the terms of the contract by the other side.

Good luck and safe hunting!

Professor Dr. Andonis Vassiliades & Maria Chimonides

© Prof. Dr. Andonis Vassiliades, December 2007. No part of this article may be used or reproduced in any form without prior written permission from the authors.

Professor Dr. Andonis Vassiliades is Professor of Law, Criminology & Penal Justice and a Clinical Psychotherapist.

Maria Chimonides is a Lawyer and a Legal Consultant.

They are at The Law Office & Research Centre:
Main Office, Larnaca: Kalogreon 16, Ria Court 19, Office 101, 6016 Larnaca
Branch, Oroklini: George Griva Digeni 16, Office 3, 7040 Oroklini (Close to the Bank of Cyprus)

Tel.: +357 24624449, +357 24654011
Fax. +357 24621336
E-mail. [email protected]

This article first appeared in In Touch Magazine, pp. 26-27, issue 14, 2008

Non-payment of communal charges

I live in a complex of apartments and after nine long and frustrating years we all got our Title Deeds last May. We took over responsibility for the administration and management of the apartments from our developer and our lawyer helped us set up a “Management Committee” to look after things.

There are forty eight apartments in total and nearly everyone has paid their communal charges towards the insurance and upkeep of the common areas. But there is one person who owns six apartments who refuses to pay anything. He lives in the UK and Ive only ever met him once in all the time we’ve lived here. He bought the apartments to rent to holiday makers, but their always empty. He has also been trying to sell them for the last two years, but at the silly price he is asking, no-one is interested in buying.

We have contacted him and our lawyer has contacted him, but he refuses to pay. I have also spoken with him on the telephone and he says that as he doesn’t use the apartments he doesn’t need to pay the management charges.

Is there anything we can do to make him pay?

Answer

This is a very common problem as it is often difficult getting communal charges out of absentee owners.

But your Management Committee can apply to a Court for a judgement in its favour ordering the person to pay. Armed with this judgement, the Committee may register a charge with the Land Registry against any immovable property registered in the name of the person as security for the recovery of the debt.

This is known as a ‘memo’ or ‘memorandum’ and effectively prevents the person from selling the property until the debt has been cleared and the memo removed.

Although this will not get you the money immediately, when this person does manage to sell the apartments, he’ll have to pay off the debt.

I suggest you talk this over with your lawyer; he’ll be the best person to sort this out for you.

Title Deeds: capital gains tax liability

AFTER 18 years we have just been advised that the Title Deeds for our house are now available. But I have just received a letter from the property developer saying that I have to contact previous owner about the tax.

I don’t know where he’s living or if he’s even still alive as he went back to the UK. If I can find him will he be liable for tax on the Title Deed, or will this delay us being issued the Title Deed? Our contract was deposited at the Land Registry.

I do not see that it is my responsibility to contact previous owner. Your comments would be appreciated.

Answer

I think I know what the problem is. Before the Land Registry will transfer ownership of the property to your name, they require proof, a ‘Tax Clearance Certificate’ from the Inland Revenue Department that any Capital Gains Tax owing on the property have been paid.

It’s the person who made the Capital Gain who is responsible for paying the Capital Gains Tax.

So when the property developer sold the property to the person from whom you bought it, the developer would have paid Capital Gains Tax on the profit he made. Similarly, when the person sold the property to you, that person should have paid Capital Gains Tax on the profit he made.

It is in your best interests to contact the person from whom you bought. It could be that he didn’t pay the Capital Gains Tax as he was supposed to. You could also try contacting the lawyer who acted on his behalf to see if he has any records of what happened.

But I’m afraid that if you don’t get anywhere, the only option will be to pay the Capital Gains Tax yourself. I know that it’s not your responsibility, and I know it’s unfair, but I’m afraid you may have no option. It’s the way the cock-eyed system works here.

Cyprus property fraud?

Scam AlertWe bought a resale property in Cyprus near Ayia Napa just over a year ago with full Title Deeds and used an independent lawyer in Larnaca. Before we signed the contract, he told us that he’s checked things out with the Land Registry and everything was OK and after we’d signed the contract he lodged it with the Land Registry (we have this in writing).

A few days ago he called us to say he’d received our permit from the Council of Ministers and we went with one of his staff to the land registry to get our Title Deeds.

To our horror we found that the previous owners had taken out a 50,000 mortgage on the property and we couldn’t have the deeds. We were very angry and went to see our lawyer, but he insisted that he’d checked things out before we signed a contract and there was no mortgage.

Can you tell us what’s happened? Is there anything we can do?

Answer

I’m very sorry to hear what’s happened. You seem to have done your homework properly – you’ve bought a property with its Title Deeds, used an independent lawyer who seems to have checked that everything was OK, but still you find that you’ve bought a mortgaged property.

Assuming that neither your lawyer nor the Land Registry has made a mistake, what I suspect may have happened is that the owner took out a mortgage on the property between the time your lawyer checked things out with the Land Registry and the time he deposited your contract of sale for Specific Performance. (I suggest you get the details of the mortgage from the Land Registry to verify this).

If the mortgage was taken out between the Title search and the deposit of your contract, I would consider this to be fraud. You should report the matter to the Police.

I suggest you speak with your lawyer to see if he can uncover what’s happened and perhaps discuss the problem with the bank that loaned the money to see if they can help out in any way.

In the worst case, and I stress it is the worst case, you may have to pay the bank the 50,000 plus any interest to secure Title to your home. Unfortunately, the bank is within its rights to repossess your home and auction it or sell it to recover the money owed if the borrower defaults on payment. But if the person who took out the loan has another property in Cyprus, it may be possible for the bank to take alternative action.

I’m afraid that your experiences should serve as a warning to others buying property in Cyprus. Even though you may do your homework properly, use an independent lawyer who does a good job, and buy a property with its Title Deeds, things can still go very wrong!

Two accused of assaulting British property buyer released

Scam AlertTWO MEN involved in the alleged assault of British property buyer Conor O’Dwyer were released from custody yesterday, police said.

Ayia Napa police chief George Economou said there had been no need to keep the pair in custody any longer.

There was no need to hold them any longer. They were released and when the [investigation] file is completed it will decided whether the case goes to court,” he told the Cyprus Mail.

Economou said there was still more evidence to gather before the file was closed.

He added that the duo, Cyprus property developers from Paralimni, were not deemed dangerous.

The father and son were remanded in custody on Thursday for four days in connection with the brutal beating of O’ Dwyer, with whom they were engaged in a legal dispute.

During the alleged assault in Frenaros village last Monday, O’ Dwyer told police that the two men had taken his camera, which had recorded the attack.

O’Dwyer, 38, who has widely publicised the details of his property dispute with the developers on YouTube and on the website lyingbuilder.com, was kicked in the kidneys and had his head stomped on. He was admitted to Larnaca hospital where he remained for most of last week.

He told the Sunday Mail last week he was afraid for his safety if the men were released from custody while he was still on the island. “It’s been absolutely horrendous but they are now in custody and I would rather it was extended until I leave the island,” he told the paper from his hospital bed on Friday.

Copyright © Cyprus Mail 2008

Tribal mentality undermines rule of law

POLITICIANS often boast that in Cyprus we have the rule of law. Generally speaking, this is not an idle claim, even though things are far from perfect when it comes to law enforcement and the small matter of equality before the law. In these respects, which are integrally linked to any notion of rule of law, Cyprus, it would appear, still has a long way to go before we can safely make any such boast.

Many foreigners, for instance, would have little faith in the rule of law after the experiences they have had dealing with the authorities, which in most disputes blatantly side with locals irrespective of who is in the right. It is particularly so in small towns or villages where the members of the local community know each other and stick together against the outsiders. Policemen are not unknown to protect members of the local community even when they are in the wrong.

The trials and tribulations of a Briton, who was reportedly beaten up in Paralimni last Monday by two developers he has been in dispute with, was a case in point. He was in hospital for three days after suffering head injuries and external bruising, and when his lawyer called up the Paralimni police, he was told that they were “investigating an accident”. The two suspects were subsequently remanded in custody for four days, but it remains to be seen whether they will be charged.

This was, allegedly, the second time the Briton had been the victim of assault by the same developers. The first case was never heard; the charges were dropped because the plaintiff had not shown up for the hearing. He had been told by the prosecutor not to bother coming from the UK, where he lives, for the hearing because it was likely to be adjourned. The judge did not grant the request for an adjournment and the case was closed, because the main witness was absent. Would he be wrong in suspecting that he had been tricked by the authorities?

Some 18 months ago, an enterprising Polish student set up a rickshaw service in Ayia Napa, which proved very popular with tourists. However, local cab drivers felt this was hurting their business and retaliated by threatening the young Pole, damaging some of his rickshaws and beating up a couple of the operators. Ayia Napa police offered the young entrepreneur next to no protection and eventually he was forced to close his business. Such incidents do not inspire foreigners’ confidence and trust in our law enforcement.

Perhaps it is asking too much of policemen to act impartially in small, tightly-knit communities in which they may be friends or relatives of local people. In nine out of 10 disputes involving foreigners, a policeman protects the member of his community even if he or she is in the wrong. And this tribal mentality prevails more often than not, even if a Cypriot from another town is in dispute with a member of the community.

In this climate, the foreign mother of the girl who had been sexually abused when she was four should not have been surprised to hear, 10 days ago, that the charges against the girl’s father had been withdrawn and the case closed, without ever being heard by Paphos court. Some legal mistakes made during a family court hearing related to the case would have made the job of the prosecution very difficult, the Attorney-general decided. Then again, the family court’s decision to grant access rights to a father (a Paphos man) facing charges of abusing his child defied belief.

A few months ago, a DISY deputy revealed that almost half of the 141 cases of family violence, including child abuse, pending before the courts were in Paphos, in which the tribal mentality remains very strong indeed. The legislature’s pleas for family violence cases to be given priority by the courts had been ignored, he said. Could the delays be linked in any way to local suspects being protected by the Paphos police and local authorities? Nobody can say, but at the same time could the possibility be ruled out, given the tribalism that marks our small communities and the charges of corruption made a few weeks ago against the Paphos police by the Minister of Justice?

The government, judiciary and the police command need to give serious thought to this problem and come up with ways of tackling it because it is giving the country a bad reputation. More and more foreigners, including many EU nationals, are settling in Cyprus, and the authorities have a legal obligation to ensure they are treated just like Cypriots. This is what the rule of law means.

Copyright © Cyprus Mail 2008